The EU 2100 Strategy

No, that’s not a typo, it really does say 2100, ninety years from now. It hardly bears thinking about what sort of world we’ll be living in – well, our children and grand-children at least – if the following is current thinking within the EU. The prayer for today has to be ‘please let these f/tards implode – and make it soon’.

I couldn’t find much online about Iulian Oneasca, the author of the document, beyond the fact that he once worked at the Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Bucharest and now works at the European Institute for Romania (possibly just a name change, a takeover of the Institute).  He’s a good European is Iulian. He offers his critique and advice to the European Commission on their strategies; he points out “the joys and delights” and he points out the pitfalls.

Pitfalls such as “empowering people.”  He likens it to a coin with two faces: “the ugly one has been exposed by the Swiss […] banning the construction of new minarets across Switzerland, towards the end of 2009”.

A new thinking and a fresh approach are required. Enhanced information and empowerment of the populations could generate positive emulations, provided that detrimental cultural heritage is filtered.

He goes on:

[The] EU needs a life-time horizon to reinvent itself, reshape humans and heal societal and institutional structures in which they operate.[…]. The passage from domination and exercise of force to global governance, the force of arguments and principles, is smooth and deliberate. This is the genuine Avatar2, the virtual projection that we are seeking for. It promotes a comprehensive approach based on the following three pillars:

  1. Humans and Humanity, addressing Economy, Society and Well being;
  2. Environment, aiming to Clean environment and Energy resources;
  3. Interactions, Terrestrial or Cosmic.

Iulian is nothing if not ambitious, with a grand vision for future humanity:

There are sufficient reasons to consider social issues as powerful shaping forces, which Europe should not ignore:
a. Exclusion processes, which have developed over generations through various channels, such as cultural heritage, ethnicity or religious bigotry, are strengthened by economic deprivations.
b. The human’s cultural heritage is impregnated with germs of violence, intolerance and discrimination. […] Adding to the exclusion, these threats may be accompanied and reinforced by resurgent nationalism and right-wing extremism that will focus on foreigners and immigrants.
Reinventing the human being may be the proper solution. It requires thorough and early interventions that may spread over a life time. EU should enhance forming its citizens and their civic spirit.

I told you he was a good European didn’t I?  And this is an example of the type of person they take their advice from.  Where the heck did we go wrong?

I’ll answer that for you – we went wrong by trusting our politicians: those members of society, our friends and neighbours, who said, ‘vote for me and I will represent you in a democracy’.  Well, they didn’t, they haven’t and they aren’t.  We’re guinea pigs, fodder, pieces on a chess board, and they’re playing with us, carrying out their little experiments.  Their last experiment, with the economy and monetary system, has gone badly wrong but I doubt they care; it’s just an exercise – they’re on manoeuvres.

UPDATE: Do me a favour and someone, please, put me out of my misery:

Common Purpose is piloting a course for Libyans in the UK who remain deeply connected to the country, and want to make an effective contribution to Libya even if from afar.

9 responses to “The EU 2100 Strategy

  1. This makes Orwell's 1984 seem like Snow White.

  2. How perverse it is that the bureaucratic vanguard stratum of the EU superstate possesses an active animus towards the constituent native peoples of Europe. Why are the members of this governing class so hell-bent upon destroying Europeans and their distinctive cultures and civilisation? It is insane. We can only hope that their project implodes before we are swamped by the Islamic Afro-Asiatic hordes.

  3. It does, OR, and this type of thinking is pervasive within the eu. To say that our government is traitorous is an understatement. It's inconceivable that they're not privy to the bigger picture.

    Hello Durotrigan. It's possibly because the eu is mostly composed of socialists, 'ex' maoists and 'ex' trotskyites. How they've managed to represent 'the Centre' is beyond me, and I suspect beyond Hegel too. They want one world, no nations, no differentiation between cultures. England has been a testing ground – but I don't think it's working. We, the English, are now the extreme right-wing, xenophobic fascists, apparently, and we don't have to do or say anything – we just have to say we're English 🙂 That's why I kick back so much.

  4. The entire ethos and language demonstrate just how authoritarian these people are, they can't even contemplate that any other opinion should be allowed to exist.

  5. I find it incredible, Woodsy. It's as if they're talking about a different species of humanity. It's like school-children checking out an ant hill. Scarey.

  6. It's nice to know so many people are getting it. That's something anyway.

  7. But they're not, are they, Kid? If this sort of thing got a mention in the msm it might eventually filter through, but it doesn't. The info is still largely confined to blogs.

  8. Ms Goodnight :),
    Maybe I'm being optimistic. We'll see how large the “silent majority” is in another year.

  9. And maybe I'm being pessimistic 😦 I hope you're right. It's just that the longer it takes, the more painful it will be.